Protect users.
Protect your brand.
In real time.
Looking for a content moderation platform that actually understands games and online behavior?

A side-by-side look at real-time, user-focused moderation versus a platform that’s seems to have moved on.
While Others Shift Focus
We’re Continuously Sharpening Ours
The Active Fence Alternative
Protecting users, and especially the young ones isn’t a trend.
It’s our mission. And we’re just getting started.
As the trust and safety landscape evolves, some platforms have pivoted away from real-time content moderation to pursue broader AI infrastructure and enterprise solutions. But for platforms with young users, the risks are immediate, human, and urgent.
Amanda is built for this. Amanda is an always-on AI that understands the way users interact, communicates in real time, and stops harm before it spreads.
This comparison shows how Aiba performs against ActiveFence, and why purpose-built moderation is more essential than ever when your community includes kids, creators, and risk that can’t wait.

In short:
Chose Amanda if you’re managing a fast-paced, interactive platform where safety can’t wait. Amanda moderates in real time, understands in-game behavior, and blocks harm before it spreads. With context-aware AI, multilingual models, and built-in compliance tools, Amanda prevents threats, not just responds to them. It’s not just a good fit. It’s built for this.

ActiveFence has shifted toward AI trust and digital safety frameworks. Content moderation now plays a smaller role, and tools like “Active OS” are no longer a visible focus. For broad, cross-channel content needs, it may still offer value. This pivot suggests moderation is no longer the priority — and that matters.